Nucleic Acids Regulate Intracellular Ions and Membrane Potential

Abstract

The positive charge on the major intracellular inorganic cations (K⁺, Na⁺, and Mg²⁺) significantly exceeds the combined negative charge on Cl^- and HCO₃^-. This so-called anion gap must be balanced by organic anions. From the analysis of published data, we conclude that organic phosphorus-containing compounds (P_o) are responsible for the neutralization of much of the anion gap. Importantly, many of them are large polymers, such as DNA, RNA, or polyphosphate, that undergo regular synthesis and degradation. That produces a variable average valency z associated with organic anions. It follows from theory that an increase in z should lead to membrane hyperpolarization and accumulation of cations: this result has been known before, and here we further confirm it by an analysis based on different cellular and computational models. Furthermore, we show that inhibition of potassium channels is expected to reduce the uptake of phosphorus through sodium-coupled transporters. This suggests a simple explanation to two long-established experimental facts about DNA synthesis: namely, that it is accompanied by cell hyperpolarization and that it requires functional potassium channels.

Introduction

Intracellular fluid contains more inorganic cations than inorganic anions, creating an “anion gap” (AG) [1]. This term usually refers to the difference between the major positive and negative ions in blood plasma but could be equally applied to the cell interior. Thus, we define anion gap as the difference between the positive and negative charges on the most abundant permeant ions: potassium, sodium, and chloride. We also add magnesium to the balance, whose total concentration (mostly in the bound form) is 15-20 mM in mammalian cells [2]; the contribution of bicarbonate is typically on the order of 10 mM [3, 4]. Thus,

$$ AG \approx [K^+] + [Na^+] + 2[Mg^{2+}] - [Cl^-] $$

(Here and subsequently, all the concentrations are intracellular, unless indicated otherwise with a subscript “e”, for extracellular). The typical value of the anion gap in mammalian cells is about 0.1 M (Table 1). Such an excess of positive charges, if not neutralized by other ions, would create exceedingly strong electric forces that cannot be sustained. Therefore, the deficit of inorganic anions must be compensated by organic anions.

In theoretical treatments, the diverse organic constituents of the cell are often treated as a single impermeant pool with average molar concentration [X^z-] and average valency -z; the magnitudes of [X^z-] and z are chosen to maintain approximate iso-osmolarity with the external medium and electroneutrality. Although the organic composition of diverse cell types has been broadly characterized [5, 6, 7], the exact origin of z remains uncertain; it has only been evaluated to some extent in highly specialized cells, such as erythrocytes and muscle cells [8, 9, 10]. It seems that most authors believe that the anion gap is mainly balanced by anionic proteins, but phosphorus-containing compounds are also recognized as another possible source of negative charge [8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. In any event, this question and its implications have not been thoroughly analyzed. Indeed, the electric charge of the entire proteome is difficult to assess, and it would be challenging to create an accurate “balance sheet” of intracellular charges due to their diversity. On the other hand, intracellular phosphorus can be measured by atomic emission spectroscopy or by X-ray microanalysis, which can help to make crude estimates.

The other likely reason for the paucity of studies of impermeant ions is that they are often viewed as a static background in the events played out by the mobile inorganic ions. However, the impermeability of “impermeant” anions does not necessarily imply that their amount never changes, as they can gradually accumulate or are broken down and released into the environment.

Cell volume regulation provides a vivid example. The typical experiment involves abruptly replacing the cell medium with a hypotonic or hypertonic solution and observing the ensuing changes in cell volume, intracellular ions, or membrane potential. Many cell types restore their volume after the initial and inevitable osmotic swelling or shrinkage, often recovering within minutes or tens of minutes. It has been shown, both theoretically and experimentally, that this rapid volume restoration is caused by the redistribution of the major permeant ions: potassium, sodium, and chloride [16, 17, 18]. Sometimes, bicarbonate [19, 20, 21] or easily permeant organic osmolytes [22] are brought into the picture as well.

Long-term osmotic adaptation is different from the response to acute osmotic shock [23]. In particular, the constantly changing cell volume can hardly serve as a set point in growing and dividing cells, and there is evidence that cells are guided by the density of the dry mass instead (or the equivalent measure of cell water content) [24, 25]. No osmolytes can be considered unalterable during slow processes, and their role in cell regulation must be examined.

We will start by reviewing the available experimental data to identify the major sources of impermeant anions; we will try to make a case that organic phosphate-based anions (which, by analogy with the standard symbol P_i for inorganic phosphates, we denote with P_o) provide the bulk of the requisite negative charge. Significantly, accumulation or dissipation of P_o has been found to correlate with the membrane potential. This correlation is explained in the third, theoretical part of the paper, where we show that an increase in z (i.e., due to the synthesis of nucleic acids) is expected to hyperpolarize the cell and increase the intracellular concentration of cations, in direct agreement with experiment.

The nature of impermeant anions

Organic phosphates P_o
‍A limited compilation of the available data on intracellular ion and phosphorus concentrations is given in Table 1. Despite a spread in the data, the anion gap in mammalian cells is consistently on the order of 100-150 mM with only one major outlier noted [26].As stated earlier, the two main hypotheses posit that the deficit of anions must be matched by proteins and/or P_o. It appears from Table 1 that the molar amounts of intracellular phosphorus in mammalian cells are equivalent, on average, to three quarters of the anion gap. Since phosphorus in biological fluids is always charged and exists as a mixture of single- and double-charged anions [45], neutralization of inorganic cations must be largely due to phosphorus.

Phosphorus is delivered to the cells as inorganic phosphate P_i in the form of H₂PO₄^- and HPO₄^2- through sodium-coupled transporters. The main phosphate importers in the human are type II, bringing in one ion of HPO₄^2- along with two or three Na⁺ ions, and type III, with the stoichiometry 2Na⁺/H₂PO₄^-. The driving force for these cotransporters utilizes the Na⁺ gradient, but their exact regulation is not understood. Additionally, transporter activity may be modulated by changes in [K⁺], pH, and hormones, including parathyroid hormone [46, 47]. The efflux of P_i is largely carried out by Xenotropic and Polytropic Retrovirus Receptor 1 (XPR1) [46].

The major intracellular forms of phosphorus include nucleic acids, anionic phospholipids (phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, and phosphatidylinositol), phosphorylated proteins, polyphosphate in bacteria, inorganic phosphate, nucleotides, and diverse small metabolites (such as creatine phosphate in the muscle). The important question, however, is not only which species neutralize the anion gap but whether their amount undergoes significant variability, affecting other physiological aspects of the cell. Of these, DNA and RNA seem to be the most variable or, at any rate, variable in the most obvious ways. But first, we will briefly review the other compounds.

‍2a. Nucleotides. Inorganic phosphate and adenine nucleotides are typically present at a concentration of several mM, with ATP^4- and P_i being more abundant than ADP and AMP [48]. However, ATP is always complexed with Mg²⁺, making it essentially Mg-ATP^2-; the remaining two charges are presumably balanced by Na⁺ and K⁺. The conversion between ATP, ADP, and P_i is not expected to produce an immediate change in net negative charge. However, the amount of P_i that is consumed or released in the course of these reactions, and especially its maximum concentration, is tightly regulated by membrane transporters [49], and therefore one can expect that ATP synthesis from ADP and P_i would slightly increase both z and [X^z-], and ATP hydrolysis would decrease them.
One situation in which ATP varies significantly under normal conditions is the circadian rhythm, when ATP exhibits a peak during the night [50, 51]. During the same period, the suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons become hyperpolarized [52]. Although this fact by itself does not prove anything (the observed correlation could be due to the simple activation of the Na⁺-K⁺ pump by ATP [53]), it is at least compatible with the notion that accumulation of charged phosphate molecules shifts the membrane potential toward more negative values.

‍2b. Polyphosphate. Bacteria, yeast, and mammalian platelets contain large amounts of polyphosphate – a linear polymer made of hundreds or thousands of phosphate residues [49]. Polyphosphate accumulates in response to amino acid starvation [54] and is stored in the organelles known as acidocalcisomes. The concentration of polyphosphate within acidocalcisomes can reach molar levels; their very large negative charge is compensated by magnesium, calcium, sodium, zinc, and basic amino acids [55].
It  is difficult to directly relate the membrane potential to polyphosphate, as its accumulation (which would presumably drive the membrane potential toward hyperpolarization) occurs under adverse conditions, when the membrane potential could be affected by other factors. Nevertheless, B. subtilis were found to be slightly hyperpolarized after a 7-day starvation compared to exponentially growing cultures [56], which, again, agrees with the hypothesis that accumulation of phosphorus in a polymeric form favors hyperpolarization.

‍2c. Phosphorylated proteins. A third of all proteins contain covalently bound phosphate, and many of them express multiple phosphorylation sites [57, 58]. Thus, phosphorylated proteins can carry a substantial negative charge. It is less clear whether this charge by itself serves any significant regulatory function, as the activity of ion channels is affected by phosphorylation, and that can have a more direct impact on ions and membrane potential. For example, inhibition of phosphatases with okadaic acid causes an increase in the Ca²⁺current [59], which can easily mask the nonspecific effect of impermeant charges.

‍2d. Phospholipids. The overall negative membrane potential has two origins: the bulk processes, such as the pump-leak mechanism, and anionic phospholipids within the plasma membrane [60, 61, 62]. Although the existence of the latter type of potential is well established, little is known about its regulation, and it will not be the focus of this paper. Phospholipids are also present in intracellular compartments, where their influence on the potential across the plasma membrane should be qualitatively similar to that of other impermeant anions. Of anionic phospholipids, phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylserine carry a charge of -1, and only phosphatidylinositol has a much larger z of -4. The most active synthesis of phospholipids coincides with the S phase of the cell cycle [63].

‍2e. Nucleic acids. We can estimate the contribution of DNA to the phosphate pool and the overall negative charge. DNA or dsRNA contain 3 nmol of phosphate per μg [64]. Since the ,diploid amount of human DNA per cell is 6 pg (BioNumbers), the molar amount of phosphate is 18 fmol per cell. Therefore, a diploid cell with volume V μm³ will have 18/V mol/L of phosphate due to DNA. Table 2 lists some typical amounts of cell-averaged phosphorus concentration contained in nucleic acids.

‍The conversion of concentrations into charge equivalents requires some caution. Although each phosphate group in nucleic acids is fully ionized with charge -1 [65], approximately half of that charge is neutralized by positively charged histones [66; A. Onufriev, personal communication]. The remaining charge is compensated by potassium and sodium [67, 68].

Sperm cells are an exception, as histones are largely replaced in them with protamine. As far as we know, the extent of charge compensation by protamine has not been evaluated, but its contribution must be significant because a large increase in the phosphorus content of the nucleus over that in the midpiece or the tail is not matched by a similar increase in cations [69, 70].

RNA makes another large pool of P_o, and the amount of RNA correlates with DNA and protein synthesis [71, 72, 73]. However, the role of RNA as an impermeant anion is harder to assess because of the existence of different types of RNA and multiple RNA-binding proteins.

The correlation between DNA synthesis and membrane potential has been well established [84]. Cells experience hyperpolarization during the S and G₂ phases relative to G₁ [85, 86, 87]; moreover, hyperpolarization seems to be a requirement for the S phase initiation. Conversely, depolarization of the plasma membrane accompanies the G₂/M transition.

Likewise, the correlation between K⁺ and the phase of the cell cycle has been demonstrated multiple times ([88, 89; reviewed in [90]). Since different types of K⁺ channels can support proliferation, one may hypothesize that their activation is secondary to the more universal event of proliferation, namely, the accumulation of phosphates. Interestingly, RNA synthesis does not depend on potassium [89].

Negatively charged proteins
‍While databases of isoelectric points of proteins and proteomes are available [91], less is known about the exact values of the protein charge z. As a crude approximation, we estimated the charge on a 100-amino acid protein with composition corresponding to the prevalence of amino acids in vertebrates (Amino Acid Frequency). For that purpose, we used the computational tool available on Protein Tool. We estimated that the charge of such a protein will be z = 1.6 electron units (negative, as is assumed elsewhere in the text); thus, assuming 200 mg/ml of protein in a mammalian cell (which may be a slight overestimation of its concentration because not all cellular dry matter consists of protein) and an average molecular weight of amino acids of 110 Da, proteins are expected to contribute about 30 mM of negative charge to the cell. It should be noted that the estimation of protein charge based on amino acid sequences are not always reliable ([92] and references therein).

More specific data are scarce. There has been a large study of 30 amino acid-long segments from different organisms [93], but the published data do not allow a simple conversion to average z. The latter can only be evaluated with some confidence in a few cases. Proteins in E. coli have an average charge of 14.4 electrons/protein [94]. Assuming 2.4x10⁶ protein molecules per cell with an average volume of 0.8 μm³ [95; 96], one obtains 70 mM of equivalent charges. This can be compared to 200 mM of phosphorus measured in E. coli [97]. Even a greater predominance of phosphorus over negative proteins is found in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The reported volumes of yeast cells have ranged from 40 μm³ [98] to 90 μm³ [99] to 300 μm³ [100], but that would not affect the comparison between proteins and phosphorus. For z = 3.6 [94] and 50x10⁶ protein molecules per cell [101], one obtains 0.18 billion electron equivalents on proteins and 44 times more (7.9 billion) equivalents on phosphorus [102]. Naturally, a somewhat different picture emerges for red blood cells that lack nucleic acids. Inorganic phosphate, ATP, and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate make up around 10 mM total concentration [103; 104]. The net negative charge on a hemoglobin molecule has been estimated between z = 14 from amino acid composition [105] and 5 from osmotic properties [106, 107]. At a concentration 0.34 g/ml = 5.3 mM, the concentration of electron equivalents on hemoglobin is almost an order of magnitude higher than on phosphates, namely, 75 mM or 26 mM, depending on which estimate for z is used (incidentally, the first estimate closely matches the AG value of 89 mM listed in Table 1).

‍Heterogeneous distribution of impermeant and permeant ions
‍Elements, including ions, are distributed within the cell highly heterogeneously [108]. First, we wish to point out that the presence of electric fields may compromise the accuracy or measurements of local ion concentrations using fluorescent probes, because the thermodynamic activity of the ion and possibly of the probe and/or the probe-ion complex will be affected by the same fields. The same reservations apply to electrode-based measurements. This potentially important practical question deserves further study. Atomic spectroscopy is a more direct way to quantify intracellular elements.

The experimental data on sodium and potassium concentrations in the nucleus vs. cytoplasm have been variable. Moore and Morrill [109] cite several studies, in which nuclear sodium and potassium were much elevated over those in the cytoplasm. The data of other authors have been less consistent (Table 3). Data on rat hepatocytes in three different publications or on rat neurons in two publications contain numbers that differ by two, three-, or even five-fold. This may indicate some difficulties with X ray microanalysis or just natural variability in ion content. One possible source of variability is the heterogeneous nature of the nucleus: phosphorus and potassium concentrations are significantly higher in condensed chromatin than in the nucleoplasm [110]. The good match between the AG and phosphorus observed in many cases seems to contradict the notion that histones compensate half of the DNA negative charge (see above). However, because of the presence of variable but significant amounts of RNA in the nucleus [111], one cannot attribute all the nuclear phosphorus to DNA alone.

Theory

Here we will theoretically examine the effect of large multivalent organic anions, such as DNA, on intracellular ions and membrane potential. The synthesis of molecules, such as DNA, from nucleotides mainly results in an increase in the average z. Table 2 lists a few examples of DNA and RNA concentrations, which sometimes significantly exceed the typical ~10 mM of nucleotides and P_i. This effect is especially prominent in smaller nucleated cells, such as hematopoietic cells. In such cells, the doubling of DNA will result in almost the doubling of z.
‍
Model A [123]. In this model based on Keener and Sneyd [15], a spherical cell with surface area A and volume V is bathed in a solution with known and constant sodium, potassium, and chloride concentrations and osmolarity P. The cell interior contains variable amounts of potassium, sodium, and chloride, and a constant amount of impermeant anions X^z- with average valency -z. Passive ion fluxes into and out of the cell are quantified through the analog of Ohm’ law, in which the driving force Y is represented as the difference between the membrane potential ψ and the equilibrium Nernst potential for a given ion. In the case of potassium and sodium, the flux through the Na⁺-K⁺ pump is added. For example, the flux equation for sodium has the form

$$ \frac{d}{dt}\left( [Na^+]V\right) = q \Psi_{Na} - S $$

where S is the constant contribution of the Na⁺-K⁺ pump, and the membrane permeability for sodium is included in the coefficient q. Chloride transport is taken as entirely passive and uncoupled from other ions. These conditions provide three equations (one for each ion) for five unknowns: three intracellular ion concentrations, cell volume, and membrane potential. One of the remaining two equations needed to solve the system relates the rate of volume change to the osmolarity difference: the rate of water accumulation is proportional to membrane permeability (included in the coefficient k) and the difference between the internal and external osmolarity:

$$ \frac{dV}{dt} = kA \left( [K^+] + [Na^+] + [Cl^-] + [X^{z-}] - \Pi\right) $$

The other equation relates ψ to the difference between positive and negative charges using the “charge difference” approach [124]:

$$ \Pi = F \frac{[K^+]+[Na^+]-[Cl^-]+z[X^{z-}]}{A \cdot C}\cdot V $$

where F is the Faraday constantand C is the specific membrane capacitance.

The above set of five equations allows one to find the dependency of ψ and ion concentrations on z. The results for steady state are shown in Fig. 1A. An increase in the negative valency z of impermeant charges produces hyperpolarization (more negative ψ), as well as accumulation of potassium and sodium and a loss of chloride. It should be noted that similar results have been obtained earlier by Fraser and Huang [125].

‍Model B. This model has been extensively used by Vereninov and coworkers [127, 128, 129, 130], and the code is now available on Vereninov’s Cell Ion Flux. It assumes exact electroneutrality and iso-osmolarity between the internal and external solutions. Instead of Ohm’s law, the passive fluxes J are computed through the Goldman equation, such as

$$ J_{Na} = p_{Na} u \frac{[Na^+] \exp(u) - [Na^+]_e}{1 - \exp(u)} $$

where p_Na is the membrane permeability for Na⁺, and u is the dimensionless membrane potential:

$$ u = \frac{F}{R T} \Psi $$

The membrane potential is deduced not from the difference between positive and negative charges, as in Model A, but is back-calculated from passive fluxes. The contribution of the Na⁺-K⁺ pump is represented by a linear term:

$$ J_{Na}^{pump} = p [Na^+] $$

The cotransporters NC, KC, and NKCC are included as well, and their activities are expressed through the ratio of intracellular-to-extracellular concentrations of the respective ions.

We used this model to investigate the effect of various intracellular initial concentrations on the stabilized values of ψ and ion concentrations. The significance of the starting concentrations is that they implicitly define both [X^-] and z, which are conserved during the subsequent evolution of the system toward a stable state:

$$ [X^{z-}] = P - [Na^+] - [K^+] - [Cl^-] $$ $$ z [X^{z-}] = [Na^+] + [K^+] - [Cl^-] $$

The results are shown in Fig. 1B. The transport parameters were taken at the preset default values at Verininov’s Cell Ion Flux; the osmolarity P = 310 mM was kept constant. Eliminating cotransport changed the numerical values, but not the general shapes of the curves (not shown). Only the sum of cations affects the balanced state, but not the individual values of [Na⁺] and [K⁺].

Model C [126]. Dmitriev and coauthors [126] based their calculations on a model similar to Model A in respect with how passive cation fluxes and the membrane potential are computed. They use charge difference to calculate the membrane potential and assume passive chloride transport. One feature that distinguishes this model from others is that neutral and charged impermeant osmolytes are considered separately, with z being the average of the entire pool. Initially, cell is assumed to be a cube, which provides enough extra surface to accommodate a volume increase of up to ~40% without a change in membrane capacitance. The pump activity is not constant, as in Model A, but is a function of sodium concentration:

$$ p \propto \left( 1 + k / [Na^+] \right)^{-3} $$

The other major difference is the computation algorithm, which is described in the other article by Dmitriev and Linsenmeier in this issue. The program with an explanation and tutorials is available for download from https://sites.northwestern.edu/ralcomputational/. The results for a balanced state are depicted in Fig. 1C.

‍Model D. A modified model of neuronal ion dynamics from Düsterwald et al. [18] is based the same principles as Model A, including the “charge difference” approach of Fraser and Huang [124] (the code is available on Model of Neuronal Chloride Homeostasis). The ATPase pump rate is assumed to have cubic dependence on sodium, similar to Model C; this formulation has been shown to better replicate kinetic models than assuming constant pump rates [15]:

$$ p \propto \left( [Na^+]_i / [Na^+]_e \right)^{3} $$

The KCC2 potassium-chloride cotransporter is included in this model, with the rate of transport determined by the difference between the driving forces for potassium and chloride:

$$ J_{KCC2} \propto \Psi_{K} - \Psi_{Cl} $$

Finally, the model incorporates volume changes based on the difference between intracellular and extracellular osmolarity. An analytical solution guarantees stable steady states for physiological ranges of pump rates, z and X, and was used to generate Fig. 1D. The results reinforce the conclusion that hyperpolarization, an increase in cation concentration, and a decrease in permeant anions accompany an increase in z, in agreement with experimental observations of the effects of DNA replication (see above).

To mimic the effect of potassium channel blockers, we varied the permeability p_k or the conductance g_k of potassium channels in Models B and D. First, we computed the inward driving forces for sodium,   ψ_Na = ψ – ψ_Na. Inhibition of potassium channels results in depolarization, a slight loss of sodium, and a decrease in the inward driving force for sodium, ψ_Na = ψ – ψ_Na. The concentrations of P_iwere fixed at 5 mM inside and 1 mM outside, resulting in ψ_Pi = 42.6 mV for the monovalent ion and ψ_Pi = 21.3 mV for the divalent form. Thus, the driving force for inorganic phosphate, ψ_Pi = ψ – ψ_Pi, is always directed outward for negative membrane potentials. Fig. 2 demonstrates the effect of potassium channels on the cumulative inward driving force aψ_Na - bψ_Pi for sodium-phosphate cotransporters with different stoichiometries aNa:bP_i. According to both models, inhibition of potassium channels should reduce the P_i intake, which may at least partially account for the observed dependence of DNA replication on potassium channels [87]. Conversely, inhibition of sodium conductance is expected to produce hyperpolarization, a decrease in [Na⁺], and an augmentation of P_i transport (not shown). Although some experimental data are consistent with the latter conclusion [131], most experiments show the opposite trend [132, 133]. Obviously, the effects of monovalent ions extend beyond the enabling of phosphate intake.

Discussion

The vast majority of data on cell volume regulation have been obtained under acute conditions. For example, the concepts of regulatory volume increase or decrease refer to the responses that follow a sudden step in osmolarity and are often observed within the next 10-20 minutes. The effects of prolonged exposure to altered osmolarity are referred to as isovolumetric regulation [23, 135], which may be controlled by other mechanisms. Furthermore, on a longer time scale, cell volume can only be conserved as the average over cell population or in terminally differentiated cells. For a growing culture, the very notion of cell volume regulation may have to be revised: it appears that it is rather the dry mass concentration (or cell water content) that is subject to control [25, 136]. Similarly, a strict separation of intracellular osmolytes into permeant and impermeant does not apply to proliferating cells, because both the amount of organic osmolytes and their average charge are liable to change. However, the specific manner of their change would depend on their chemical nature, which has not been well characterized. If most of the negative charge derives from proteins, z would not be expected to vary significantly during cell growth. On the other hand, if the negative charge is carried by nucleic acids, z would be subject to change.

The data presented in Table 1 show that phosphorus is indeed a major contributor to the total pool of membrane-impermeant anions in most cell types. It is represented by diverse types of chemicals, including small metabolites and large polymers. The role of DNA as an impermeant anion deserves special consideration, especially in small cells, where the cell-averaged concentration of DNA-associated phosphate can reach high values (Table 2). In such cells, DNA replication significantly increases the average valency z, which is the main parameter influencing the mobile intracellular ions and membrane potential. The other interesting aspect of DNA as an anion is that, unlike chloride and other small ions, it strongly interacts with various counterions [137]. This effect is likely determined by the amount of the charge left uncompensated by cationic proteins, such as histones. Similar considerations may apply to RNA, only in the case of somatic DNA, the contribution of histones has been evaluated much more accurately, at around 50% [66], and, furthermore, the respective amounts of DNA and histones are tightly coordinated [138]. The remaining cations surrounding DNA have reduced mobility and an osmotic coefficient of 0.25 [139]. That means that a typical human lymphocyte with volume 200 μm³ [140, 141] has [P_o] = 100 mM; therefore, 50 mM of cations (such as potassium) will be largely removed from osmotic interactions, exhibiting an effective osmolarity of only 12 mM. A 40 mM mismatch between the electric charge and osmolarity may or may not be noticeable; however, the difference in smaller cells can be still greater. Current mathematical models do not account for a reduced activity of ions; this, however, is one case where it may be worthwhile.

Compared to nucleic acids and other sources of phosphorus, the contribution of negatively charged proteins seems moderate in most cell types. It is also less dynamic because the composition of the proteome undergoes relatively minor changes with cell cycle.

Since various cell types experience hyperpolarization and potassium accumulation during their tetraploid phase [84, 85, 86, 87], we asked if these effects may be related to the incorporation of phosphorus into DNA and an increase in z rather than to some unknown specific interactions. Thus, we undertook a theoretical analysis based on various cell models, including the one developed by A. Vereninov and colleagues. In fact, the dependence on membrane potential and intracellular ions on z has been established earlier by Fraser and Huang [124] and Kay [123], and here we reproduced some of Kay’s results in Fig. 1a. We showed that all four models agree in that an increase in z leads to hyperpolarization despite the differences in the assumed transporters, their activities, and initial concentrations. Thus, we hypothesize that the long-known effect of membrane hyperpolarization is the natural consequence of DNA synthesis and the resulting increase in the valency of impermeant anions.

Despite success in theoretically explaining hyperpolarization, the limitations of our approach must be acknowledged. Viewing the cell as a uniform space free of membranes and organelles is certainly a simplification inherent in the mathematical models of ion transport and membrane potential. In reality, the cell interior has multiple charged membranes [142, 143] that may even electrically interact with the plasma membrane [144]. Nuclear envelope also has a small potential negative inside [145], and it is possible that DNA synthesis has a stronger effect on the transport between the nucleus and the cytosol than between the cytosol and environment. However, given very limited knowledge if intracellular potentials (possibly except those in mitochondria), it would be premature to attempt a more comprehensive description.
The accumulation of potassium and sodium is another salient result from all the models. As for the requirement of potassium for DNA synthesis [88, 89, 90], it is harder to establish from bare theory; nevertheless, we showed that the driving force for P_i intake is strongly reduced when potassium channels are inhibited. That may be a sufficient explanation to the experimental data, though it does not exclude the possibility that specific interactions may also play a role. For example, it follows from the model that inhibition of sodium conductance should promote the import of P_i (not shown), but the correlation between cancer and sodium channels [84] does not support this conclusion. But such obvious and inevitable limitations do not take away from the usefulness of cell modeling. The explanation of the Gardos effect in erythrocytes that can be found elsewhere in this edition [Lew, ibid.] is another excellent example of the power of theoretical approach in cell physiology.

Acknowledgements

The stimulus for this work has been a talk by Dr. A. Kay (University of Iowa) at an informal online seminar dedicated to Alexey Vereninov’s 90^th birthday: “What is the average charge on the impermeant ions in cells and does it matter?”. Additionally, Dr. Kay has kindly provided data for Fig. 1. The authors gratefully acknowledge discussions and advice from O. S. Andersen (Cornell), M. Gerovac (University of Würzburg), R. P. Malchow (University of Illinois), A. P. Minton (NIH), A. Onufriev (Virginia Tech), J. V. Raimondo (University of Cape Town), D. J. Scanlan (University of Warwick), M. Schick (University of Washington), S. Vijayaraghavan (Kent State University,) and S. Woodson (Johns Hopkins). The work has been supported by Kent State University Research Council (MM) and by Gatsby Charitable Foundation (KD). All authors contributed to writing of the manuscript.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare

References

• 1.Kraut JA, Madias NE: Serum anion gap: its uses and limitations in clinical medicine. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;2:162-174.https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03020906
• 2.Romani AM: Cellular magnesium homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys 2011;512:1-23.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2011.05.010
• 3.Sahlin K, Alvestrand A, Brandt R, Hultman E: Intracellular pH and bicarbonate concentration in human muscle during recovery from exercise. J Appl Physiol 1978;45:474-480.https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1978.45.3.474
• 4.Sahlin K, Alvestrand A, Bergström J, Hultman E: Intracellular pH and bicarbonate concentration as determined in biopsy samples from the quadriceps muscle of man at rest. Clin Sci Mol Med 1977;53:459-466.https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0530459
• 5.Yancey PH, Siebenaller JF: Co-evolution of proteins and solutions: protein adaptation versus cytoprotective micromolecules and their roles in marine organisms. J Exp Biol 2015;218:1880-1896.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.114355
• 6.Yancey PH: Organic osmolytes as compatible, metabolic and counteracting cytoprotectants in high osmolarity and other stresses. J Exp Biol 2005;208:2819-2830.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01730
• 7.Burg MB, Ferraris JD: Intracellular organic osmolytes: function and regulation. J Biol Chem 2008;283:7309-7313.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R700042200
• 8.Burton RF: The composition of animal cells: solutes contributing to osmotic pressure and charge balance. Comp Bio Physiol B Biochem 1983;76:663-671.https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0491(83)90375-9
• 9.Conway EJ: Calculation of the idiomolar value and its electrostatic equivalent in normal mammalian skeletal muscle. Ir J Med Sci 1950;25:216-224.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02950634
• 10.Gary-Bobo CM, Solomon AK: Properties of hemoglobin solutions in red cells. J Gen Physiol 1968;52:825-853.https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.52.5.825
• 11.Macknight AD: Volume maintenance in isosmotic conditions. Curr Top Membr and Transp 1987;30:3-43.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2161(08)60366-4
• 12.Al-Habori M: Cell volume and ion transport regulation. Int J Biochem 1994;26(3):319-334.https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-711X(94)90052-3
• 13.Andersen OS: Cellular electrolyte metabolism; in Kretsinger RH, Uversky VN, Permyakov EA (eds): Encyclopedia of Metalloproteins. New York, Springer, 2013, pp 580-587https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1533-6_223
• 14.Glykys J, Dzhala V, Egawa K, Balena T, Saponjian Y, Kuchibhotla KV, Bacskai BJ, Kahle KT, Zeuthen T, Staley KJ: Local impermeant anions establish the neuronal chloride concentration. Sci 2014;343: 670-675.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245423
• 15.Keener J, Sneyd J: Mathematical Physiology (Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics). New York, Springer, 1998.https://doi.org/10.1007/b98841
• 16.Fürst J, Gschwentner M, Ritter M, Botta G, Jakab M, Mayer M, Garavaglia L, Bazzini C, Rodighiero S,Meyer G, Eichmüller S: Molecular and functional aspects of anionic channels activated during regulatory volume decrease in mammalian cells. Pflüg Arch 2002;444:1-25.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-002-0805-1
• 17.Pasantes-Morales H, Cardin V, Tuz K: Signaling events during swelling and regulatory volume decrease. Neurochem R 2000;25:1301-1314.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007652330703
• 18.Düsterwald KM, Currin CB, Burman RJ, Akerman CJ, Kay AR, Raimondo JV: Biophysical models reveal the relative importance of transporter proteins and impermeant anions in chloride homeostasis. Elife 2018;7:e39575.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39575
• 19.Nicholl A, Killey J, Leonard M, Garner C: The role of bicarbonate in regulatory volume decrease (RVD) in the epithelial-derived human breast cancer cell line ZR-75-1 Pflüg Archiv 2002;443:875-881.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-001-0771-z
• 20.Casey JR: Why bicarbonate? Biochem Cell Biol 2006;84:930-939.https://doi.org/10.1139/o06-184
• 21.Li Y, Zhou X, Sun SX: Hydrogen, bicarbonate, and their associated exchangers in cell volume regulation. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:1640.https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.683686
• 22.Burg MB, Ferraris JD: Intracellular organic osmolytes: function and regulation. J Biol Chem 2008;283:7309-7313.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R700042200
• 23.Souza MM, Boyle RT, Lieberman M: Different physiological mechanisms control isovolumetric regulation and regulatory volume decrease in chick embryo cardiomyocytes. Cell Biol Int, 2000;24:713-721.https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.2000.0554
• 24.Model MA, Hollembeak JE, Kurokawa M: Macromolecular crowding: A hidden link between cell volume and everything else. Cell Physiol Biochem 2021;55:25-40.https://doi.org/10.33594/000000319
• 25.Hollembeak JE, Model MA: Stability of intracellular protein concentration under extreme osmotic challenge. Cells 2021;10:3532.https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123532
• 26.Nkamgueu EM, Adnet JJ, Bernard J, Zierold K, Kilian L, Jallot E, Benhayoune H, Bonhomme P: In vitro effects of zirconia and alumina particles on human blood monocyte-derived macrophages: X-ray microanalysis and flow cytometric studies. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:587-594.https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<587::aid-jbm2>3.0.CO;2-1
• 27.Heldal M, Norland S, Tumyr O: X-ray microanalytic method for measurement of dry matter and elemental content of individual bacteria. Appl Env Microbiol 1985;50:1251-1257.https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.50.5.1251-1257.1985
• 28.Heldal M, Scanlan DJ, Norland S, Thingstad F, Mann NH: Elemental composition of single cells of various strains of marine Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus using X-ray microanalysis. Limnol Oceanogr 2003;48:1732-1743.https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1732
• 29.Maughan D, Recchia C: Diffusible sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium and phosphorus in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol 1985;368:545-563.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015875
• 30.Hironaka T, Morimoto S:Intracellular chloride concentration and evidence for the existence of a chloride pump in frog skeletal muscle. Jpn J Physiol 1980;30:357-363.https://doi.org/10.2170/jjphysiol.30.357
• 31.Butt AG, Bowler JM, McLaughlin CW: Villus and crypt cell composition in the secreting mouse jejunum measured with x-ray microanalysis. J Membr Biol 1998;162:17-29.https://doi.org/10.1007/s002329900338
• 32.Zierold K: Heavy metal cytotoxicity studied by electron probe X-ray microanalysis of cultured rat hepatocytes. Toxicol In vitro 2000;14:557-563.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(00)00049-7
• 33.Buja LM, Burton KP, Hagler HK, Willerson JT: Quantitative x-ray microanalysis of the elemental composition of individual myocytes in hypoxic rabbit myocardium. Circulation 1983;68:872-882.https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.68.4.872
• 34.Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV, Shuman H: Electron probe analysis of vascular smooth muscle. Composition of mitochondria, nuclei, and cytoplasm. J Cell Biol 1979;81:316-335.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.81.2.316
• 35.Warley A: Potassium concentration is reduced in cultured rabbit tracheal smooth muscle cells after withdrawal of serum. Cell Biol Int 2001;25:691-695.https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.2000.0711
• 36.Salido M, Vilches J, Lopez A, Roomans GM: X-ray microanalysis of etoposide-induced apoptosis in the PC-3 prostatic cancer cell line. Cell Biol Int 2001;25:499-508.https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.2000.0763
• 37.O'Loughlin EV, Hunt DM, Bostrom TE, Hunter D, Gaskin KJ, Gyory A, Cockayne DJ: X-ray microanalysis of cell elements in normal and cystic fibrosis jejunum: evidence for chloride secretion in villi. Gastroenterology 1996;110:411-418.https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8566587
• 38.Sanchez-Quevedo MC, Alaminos M, Capitan LM, Moreu G, Garzon I, Crespo PV, Campos A: Histological and histochemical evaluation of human oral mucosa constructs developed by tissue engineering. Histol Histopathol 2007;22:631-640.
• 39.Keitel HG, Berman H, Jones H, MacLachlan E: The chemical composition of normal human red blood cells, including variability among centrifuged cells. Blood 1955;10:370-376.https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V10.4.370.370
• 40.Tanaka YK, Lida R, Takada S, Kubota T, Yamanaka M, Sugiyama N, Abdelnour Y, Ogra Y: Quantitative Elemental Analysis of a Single Cell by Using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry in Fast Time-Resolved Analysis Mode. ChemBioChem 2020;21:3266-3272.https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000358
• 41.Mouat MA, Manchester KL: The intracellular ionic strength of red cells and the influence of complex formation. Comp Haematol Int 1998;8:58-60.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628107
• 42.Arrebola F, Canizares J, Cubero MA, Crespo PV, Warley A, Fernández-Segura E: Biphasic behavior of changes in elemental composition during staurosporine-induced apoptosis. Apoptosis 2005;10:1317-1331.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-005-2718-x
• 43.Warley A, Stephen J, Hockaday A, Appleton TC: X-ray microanalysis of HeLa S3 cells. I. Instrumental calibration and analysis of randomly growing cultures. J Cell Sci 1983;60:217-229.https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.60.1.217
• 44.Skepper JN, Karydis I, Garnett MR, Hegyi L, Hardwick SJ, Warley A, Mitchinson MJ, Cary NR: Changes in elemental concentrations are associated with early stages of apoptosis in human monocyte-macrophages exposed to oxidized low-density lipoprotein: an X-ray microanalytical study. J Pathol 1999;188:100-106.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199905)188:1<100::aid-path306>3.0.CO;2-O
• 45.Walsh CT: Introduction to phosphorus chemical biology; in Walsh CT (ed): Chemical Biology of Phosphorus. Croydon, UK, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020, pp 3-26.https://doi.org/10.1039/9781839162312-00003
• 46.Hernando N, Gagnon K, Lederer E: Phosphate transport in epithelial and nonepithelial tissue. Physiol Rev 2021;101:1-35.https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00008.2019
• 47.Levi M, Gratton E, Forster IC, Hernando N, Wagner CA, Biber J, Sorribas V, Murer H: Mechanisms of phosphate transport. Nat Rev Nephrol 2019;15:482-500.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0159-y
• 48.Nelson DL, Cox MM: Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, ed 3, Worth Publishers, 2000.
• 49.Austin S, Mayer A: Phosphate homeostasis− a vital metabolic equilibrium maintained through the INPHORS signaling pathway. Front Microbiol 2020;11:1367.https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01367
• 50.Yamazaki S, Ishida Y, Inouye S: Circadian rhythms of adenosine triphosphate contents in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, anterior hypothalamic area and caudate putamen of the rat-negative correlation with electrical activity. Brain Res 1994;664:237-240.https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)91978-X
• 51.Womac AD, Burkeen JF, Neuendorff N, Earnest DJ, Zoran MJ: Circadian rhythms of extracellular ATP accumulation in suprachiasmatic nucleus cells and cultured astrocytes. Eur J Neurosci 2009;30:869-876.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06874.x
• 52.Kuhlman SJ, McMahon DG: Rhythmic regulation of membrane potential and potassium current persists in SCN neurons in the absence of environmental input. Eur J Neurosci 2004;20:1113-1117.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03555.x
• 53.Horvat A, Momic T, Petrovic S, Nikezic G, Demajo M: Selective inhibition of brain Na, K-ATPase by drugs. Physiol Res 2006;55:325.https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.930696
• 54.Kuroda A, Ohtake H: Molecular analysis of polyphosphate accumulation in bacteria. Biochem (Mosc) 2000;65:304-308.
• 55.Docampo R, Ulrich P, Moreno SN: Evolution of acidocalcisomes and their role in polyphosphate storage and osmoregulation in eukaryotic microbes. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2010;365:775-784.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0179
• 56.Gray DA, Dugar G, Gamba P, Strahl H, Jonker MJ, Hamoen LW: Extreme slow growth as alternative strategy to survive deep starvation in bacteria. Nat Comm 2019;10:1-12.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08719-8
• 57.Cohen P: The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation-a 25 year update. Trends Biochem Sci 2000;25:596-601.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01712-6
• 58.Vlastaridis P, Kyriakidou P, Chaliotis A, Van de Peer Y, Oliver SG, Amoutzias GD: Estimating the total number of phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteomes. Gigasci 2017;6:1-11.https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giw015
• 59.Hescheler J, Mieskes G, Rüegg JC, Takai A, Trautwein W: Effects of a protein phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, on membrane currents of isolated guinea-pig cardiac myocytes. Pflüg Archiv 1988;412:248-252.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582504
• 60.Honig BH, Hubbell WL, Flewelling RF: Electrostatic interactions in membranes and proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1986;15:163-193.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.001115
• 61.Khitrin AK, Khitrin KA, Model MA: A model for membrane potential and intracellular ion distribution. Chem Phys Lipids 2014;184:76-81.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2014.10.005
• 62.Ma Y, Poole K, Goyette J, Gaus K: Introducing membrane charge and membrane potential to T cell signaling. Front Immunol 2017;8:1513.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01513
• 63.Jackowski S: Cell cycle regulation of membrane phospholipid metabolism. J Biol Chem 1996;271:20219-20222.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.34.20219
• 64.Barichello JM, Ishida T, Kiwada H: Complexation of siRNA and pDNA with cationic liposomes: the important aspects in lipoplex preparation. Liposomes 2010;604:461-472https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-360-2_32
• 65.Lipfert J, Doniach S, Das R, Herschlag D: Understanding nucleic acid-ion interactions. Annu Rev Biochem 2014;83:813-841.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060409-092720
• 66.Korolev N, Lyubartsev AP, Nordenskiöld L: Computer modeling demonstrates that electrostatic attraction of nucleosomal DNA is mediated by histone tails. Biophys J 2006;90:4305-4316.https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.080226
• 67.Várnai P, Zakrzewska K: DNA and its counterions: a molecular dynamics study. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:4269-4280.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh765
• 68.Lavery R, Maddocks JH, Pasi M, Zakrzewska K: Analyzing ion distributions around DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:8138-8149.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku504
• 69.Cottell E, Harrison RF: The value of subcellular elemental analysis in the assessment of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3186-3189.https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135884
• 70.Sheppard BL, Harrison RF, Sheppard U, Jordan M, Hannon K: Variations in Elemental Distribution in Human Spermatozoa: Schwankungen in der elementaren Verteilung bei menschlichen Spermatozoen. Andrologia 1988;20:218-224.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1988.tb01060.x
• 71.Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR: The ratio of RNA to total nucleic acid content as a quantitative measure of unbalanced cell growth. Cytometry 1982;2:212-218.https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990020403
• 72.Crissman HA, Darzynkiewicz Z, Tobey RA, Steinkamp JA: Correlated measurements of DNA, RNA, and protein in individual cells by flow cytometry. Science 1985;228:1321-1324.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2408339
• 73.Pfeiffer SE, Tolmach LJ: RNA synthesis in synchronously growing populations of HeLa S3 cells. I. Rate of total RNA synthesis and its relationship to DNA synthesis. J Cell Physiol 1968;71:77-93.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1040710110
• 74.Yeung CH, Anapolski M, Depenbusch M, Zitzmann M, Cooper TG: Human sperm volume regulation. Response to physiological changes in osmolality, channel blockers and potential sperm osmolytes. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1029-1036.https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg204
• 75.Li Q, Rycaj K, Chen X, Tang DG: Cancer stem cells and cell size: a causal link? Semin Cancer Biol 2015;35:191-199.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.07.002
• 76.Segel GB, Cokelet GR, Lichtman MA: The measurement of lymphocyte volume: importance of reference particle deformability and counting solution tonicity. Blood 1981;57:894-899.https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V57.5.894.894
• 77.Kuse R, Schuster S, Schübbe H, Dix S, Hausmann K:Blood lymphocyte volumes and diameters in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and normal controls. Blut 1985;50:243-248.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320301
• 78.Şafak B, Baykan Ö, Kılınç O, Yıldırım DÖ: The importance of mean neutrophil volume (mnv) values in differential diagnosis of bacterial sepsis. J Nat Med Assoc 2017;109:211-214.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2017.01.004
• 79.Lee AJ, Kim SG: Mean cell volumes of neutrophils and monocytes are promising markers of sepsis in elderly patients. Blood Res 2013;48:193-197.https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2013.48.3.193
• 80.Sharma S, Cabana R, Shariatmadar S, Krishan A: Cellular volume and marker expression in human peripheral blood apheresis stem cells. Cytometry A 2008;73:160-167.https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20524
• 81.James MB, Giorgio TD: Nuclear-associated plasmid, but not cell-associated plasmid, is correlated with transgene expression in cultured mammalian cells. Mol Ther 2000;1:339-346.https://doi.org/10.1006/mthe.2000.0054
• 82.Verma SC, Qian Z, Adhya SL: Architecture of the Escherichia coli nucleoid. PLoS Genet 2019;15:e1008456.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008456
• 83.Wu J, Xiao J, Zhang Z, Wang X, Hu S, Yu J: Ribogenomics: the science and knowledge of RNA. Genom Proteom Bioinform 2014;12:57-63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2014.04.002
• 84.Blackiston DJ, McLaughlin KA,Levin M: Bioelectric controls of cell proliferation: ion channels, membrane voltage and the cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2009;8:3527-3536.https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.21.9888
• 85.Cone Jr CD: Section of biological and medical sciences: electroosmotic interactions accompanying mitosis initiation in sarcoma cells in vitro. Trans NY Acad Sci 1969;31:404-427.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1969.tb02926.x
• 86.Sachs HG, Stambrook PJ, Ebert JD: Changes in membrane potential during the cell cycle. Exp Cell Res 1974;83:362-366.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(74)90350-4
• 87.Wonderlin WF, Woodfork KA, Strobl JS: Changes in membrane potential during the progression of MCF-7 human mammary tumor cells through the cell cycle. J Cell Physiol 1995;165:177-185.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041650121
• 88.Frantz CN, Nathan DG, Scher CD: Intracellular univalent cations and the regulation of the BALB/c-3T3 cell cycle. J Cell Biol 1981;88:51-56.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.88.1.51
• 89.Ledbetter ML, Lubin M: Control of protein synthesis in human fibroblasts by intracellular potassium. Exp Cell Res 1977;105:223-236.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(77)90120-3
• 90.Urrego D, Tomczak AP, Zahed F, Stühmer W, Pardo LA: Potassium channels in cell cycle and cell proliferation. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2014;369:20130094.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0094
• 91.Kozlowski LP: Proteome-pI 2.0: proteome isoelectric point database update. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D1535-D1540.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab944
• 92.Kyne C, Jordon K, Filoti DI, Laue TM, Crowley PB: Protein charge determination and implications for interactions in cell extracts. Protein Sci 2017;26:258-267.https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3077
• 93.Requião RD, Fernandes L, de Souza, HJA, Rossetto S, Domitrovic T, Palhano FL: Protein charge distribution in proteomes and its impact on translation. PLoS Comput Biol 2017;13:e1005549.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005549
• 94.Xu Y, Wang H, Nussinov R, Ma B: Protein charge and mass contribute to the spatio-temporal dynamics of protein-protein interactions in a minimal proteome. Proteomics 2013;13:1339-1351.https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201100540
• 95.Pedersen S, Bloch PL, Reeh S, Neidhardt FC: Patterns of protein synthesis in E. coli: a catalog of the amount of 140 individual proteins at different growth rates. Cell 1978;14:179-190.https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(78)90312-4
• 96.Lababidi SL, Pelts M, Moitra M, Leff LG, Model MA: Measurement of bacterial volume by transmission-through-dye imaging. J Microbiol Methods 2011;87:375-377.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2011.08.019
• 97.Wade HE:Variation in the phosphorus content of Escherichia coli during cultivation. Microbiol 1952;7:24-30.https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-7-1-2-24
• 98.Pérez-Ortín JE, Mena A, Barba-Aliaga M, Singh A, Chávez S, García-Martínez J: Cell volume homeostatically controls the rDNA repeat copy number and rRNA synthesis rate in yeast. PLoS Genet 2021;17:e1009520.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009520
• 99.Barber F, Amir A, Murray AW: Cell-size regulation in budding yeast does not depend on linear accumulation of Whi5 Proc Natl Acad Sci 2020;117:14243-14250.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001255117
• 100.Zakhartsev M, Reuss M: Cell size and morphological properties of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in relation to growth temperature. FEMS Yeast Res 2018;18:foy052.https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foy052
• 101.Futcher B, Latter GI, Monardo P, McLaughlin CS, Garrels JI: A sampling of the yeast proteome. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19, 7357-7368.https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.11.7357
• 102.Groombridge AS, Miyashita SI, Fujii SI, Nagasawa K, Okahashi T, Ohata M, Umemura T, Takatsu A, Inagaki K, Chiba K: High sensitive elemental analysis of single yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) by time-resolved inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry using a high efficiency cell introduction system. Anal Sci 2013;29:597-603.https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.29.597
• 103.Bartlett GR: Phosphate compounds in vertebrate red blood cells. Am Zool 1980;20:103-114.https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/20.1.103
• 104.Noorwali A, Preston CJ, Challa A, Russell RGG: Measurement of intracellular inorganic phosphate in human blood red cells, leucocytes and platelets. Adv Exp Med Biol 1982;151:37-146.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4259-5_19
• 105.Scheinberg HI: The structural basis of differences in electrophoretic behavior of human hemoglobins; in Proceedings of the Conference on Hemoglobin, Washington, DC, USA 1957, pp. 2-3.
• 106.Gros G, Rollema HS, Jelkmann WO, Gros HA, Bauer CH, Moll WA: Net charge and oxygen affinity of human hemoglobin are independent of hemoglobin concentration. J Gen Physiol 1978;72:765-73.https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.72.6.765
• 107.Solomon AK, Toon MR, Dix JA: Osmotic properties of human red cells. J Membr Biol 986;91:259-273.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868819
• 108.Malucelli E, Lotti S, Gianoncelli A, Fratini M, Merolle L, Notargiacomo A, Marraccini C, Sargenti A, Cappadone C, Farruggia G, Bukreeva I, Lombardo M, Trombini C, Maier JA, Lagomarsino S: Quantitative chemical imaging of the intracellular spatial distribution of fundamental elements and light metals in single cells. Anal Chem 2014;86:5108-5115.https://doi.org/10.1021/ac5008909
• 109.Moore RD, Morrill GA: A possible mechanism for concentrating sodium and potassium in the cell nucleus. Biophys J 1976;16:527-533.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85707-4
• 110.Nolin F, Michel J, Wortham L, Tchelidze P, Banchet V, Lalun N, Terryn C, Ploton D: Stage-specific changes in the water, Na+, Cl- and K+ contents of organelles during apoptosis, demonstrated by a targeted cryo correlative analytical approach. PLoS One 2016;11:0148727.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148727
• 111.Piwnicka M, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR: RNA and DNA content of isolated cell nuclei measured by multiparameter flow cytometry. Cytometry 1983;3:269-275.https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990030407
• 112.Scott DA, Docampo R, Dvorak JA, Shi S, Leapman RD: In situ compositional analysis of acidocalcisomes in Trypanosoma cruzi. J Biol Chem 1997;272:28020-28029.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.44.28020
• 113.LeFurgey A, Ingram P, Blum JJ: Compartmental responses to acute osmotic stress in Leishmania major result in rapid loss of Na+ and Cl−. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2001;128:385-394.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(00)00319-6
• 114.LeFurgey A, Ingram P, Lieberman M: Quantitative microchemical imaging of calcium in Na-K pump inhibited heart cells. Cell Calcium 1988;9:219-235.https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-4160(88)90003-6
• 115.Kirk RG, Lee P, Reasor MJ: Quantitative X-ray microanalysis of alveolar macrophages after long-term treatment with amiodarone. Exp Mol Pathol, 1990;52:122-131.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4800(90)90064-K
• 116.Cameron IL, Smith NK, Pool TB, Sparks RL: Intracellular concentration of sodium and other elements as related to mitogenesis and oncogenesis in vivo. Cancer Res 1980;40(5):1493-1500.
• 117.Zierold K: Effects of cadmium on electrolyte ions in cultured rat hepatocytes studied by X-ray microanalysis of cryosections. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1997;144:70-76.https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1996.8094
• 118.Bolkent S, Zierold K: Effects of the ionophores valinomycin, ionomycin and gramicidin A on the element compartmentation in cultured rat hepatocytes. Toxicol In vitro 2002;16:159-165.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(01)00108-4
• 119.LoPachin Jr RM, Lowery J, Eichberg J, Kirkpatrick JB, Cartwright Jr J, Saubermann AJ: Distribution of elements in rat peripheral axons and nerve cell bodies determined by x-ray microprobe analysis. J Neurochem 1988;51:764-775.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb01811.x
• 120.LoPachin RM, Gaughan CL, Lehning EJ, Weber ML, Taylor CP: Effects of ion channel blockade on the distribution of Na, K, Ca and other elements in oxygen-glucose deprived CA1 hippocampal neurons. Neurosci 2001;103:971-983.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00035-5
• 121.Arrebola F, Fernandez-Segura E, Campos A, Crespo PV, Skepper JN, Warley A: Changes in intracellular electrolyte concentrations during apoptosis induced by UV irradiation of human myeloblastic cells. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiol 2006;290:C638-C649.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00364.2005
• 122.Di Francesco A, Desnoyer RW, Covacci V, Wolf FI, Romani A, Cittadini A, Bond M: Changes in magnesium content and subcellular distribution during retinoic acid-induced differentiation of HL60 cells. Archiv Biochem Biophys 1998;360:149-157.https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1998.0937
• 123.Kay AR: How cells can control their size by pumping ions. Front Cell Dev Biol 2017;5:41.https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2017.00041
• 124.Fraser JA, Huang CL: Quantitative techniques for steady-state calculation and dynamic integrated modelling of membrane potential and intracellular ion concentrations. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007;94:336-372.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.10.001
• 125.Fraser JA, Huang CL: A quantitative analysis of cell volume and resting potential determination and regulation in excitable cells. J Phys 2004;559:459-478.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.065706
• 126.Dmitriev AV, Dmitriev AA, Linsenmeier RA: The logic of ionic homeostasis: Cations are for voltage, but not for volume. PLoS Comput Biol 2019;15:1006894.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006894
• 127.Vereninov AA, Goryachaya TS, Moshkov AV, Vassilieva IO, Yurinskaya VE, Lang F, Rubashkin AA: Analysis of the monovalent ion fluxes in U937 cells under the balanced ion distribution: recognition of ion transporters responsible for changes in cell ion and water balance during apoptosis. Cell Biol Int 2007;31:382-393.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.01.023
• 128.Yurinskaya VE, Rubashkin AA, Vereninov AA: Balance of unidirectional monovalent ion fluxes in cells undergoing apoptosis: why does Na+/K+ pump suppression not cause cell swelling? J Physiol 2011;589:2197-2211.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.207571
• 129.Yurinskaya VE, Vereninov IA, Vereninov AA: A tool for computation of changes in Na+, K+, Cl− channels and transporters due to apoptosis by data on cell ion and water content alteration. Front Cell Dev Biol 2019;7:58.https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00058
• 130.Yurinskaya VE, Vereninov AA: Cation-chloride cotransporters, Na/K pump, and channels in cell water/ionic balance regulation under hyperosmolar conditions: in silico and experimental studies of opposite RVI and AVD responses of U937 cells to hyperosmolar media. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:830563-830563.https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.736488
• 131.Ware AW, Harris JJ, Slatter TL, Cunliffe HE, McDonald FJ: The epithelial sodium channel has a role in breast cancer cell proliferation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021;187:31-43.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06133-7
• 132.Xu S, Liu C, Ma Y, Ji HL, Li X: Potential roles of amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in cancer development. Biomed Res Int 2016;Article ID 2190216,https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2190216
• 133.Sparks RL, Pool TB, Smith NK, Cameron IL: Effects of amiloride on tumor growth and intracellular element content of tumor cells in vivo. Cancer Res 1983;43:73-77.
• 134.Dubois JM, Rouzaire-Dubois B: Role of potassium channels in mitogenesis. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 1993;59:1-21.https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6107(93)90005-5
• 135.Pasantes-Morales H, Franco R, Torres-Marquez ME, Hernández-Fonseca K, Ortega A: Amino acid osmolytes in regulatory volume decrease and isovolumetric regulation in brain cells: contribution and mechanisms. Cell Physiol Biochem 2000;10:361-370.https://doi.org/10.1159/000016369
• 136.Van Den Berg J, Boersma AJ, Poolman B: Microorganisms maintain crowding homeostasis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017;15:309-318.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.17
• 137.Allahyarov E, Löwen H, Gompper G: Adsorption of monovalent and multivalent cations and anions on DNA molecules. Phys Rev E 2003;68:061903.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.061903
• 138.Claude KL, Bureik D, Chatzitheodoridou D, Adarska P, Singh A, Schmoller KM: Transcription coordinates histone amounts and genome content. Nat Comm 2021;12:1-17.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24451-8
• 139.Raspaud E, Da Conceicao M, Livolant F: Do free DNA counterions control the osmotic pressure? Phys Rev Lett 2000;84:2533.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2533
• 140.Kuse R, Schuster S, Schübbe H, Dix S, Hausmann K: Blood lymphocyte volumes and diameters in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and normal controls. Blut 1985;50:243-248.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320301
• 141.Segel GB, Cokelet GR, Lichtman MA: The measurement of lymphocyte volume: importance of reference particle deformability and counting solution tonicity. Blood 1981;57:894-899.https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V57.5.894.894
• 142.Saminathan A, Devany J, Veetil AT, Suresh B, Pillai KS, Schwake M, Krishnan Y: A DNA-based voltmeter for organelles. Nat Nanotech 2021;16:96-103.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00784-1
• 143.Matamala E, Castillo C, Vivar JP, Rojas PA, Brauchi SE: Imaging the electrical activity of organelles in living cells. Comm Biol 2021;4:389.https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01916-6
• 144.Sepehri Rad M, Cohen LB, Braubach O, Baker BJ: Monitoring voltage fluctuations of intracellular membranes. Sci Rep 2018;8:6911.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25083-7
• 145.Loewenstein WR, Kanno Y: Some electrical properties of a nuclear membrane examined with a microelectrode. J Gen Physiol 1963;46:1123-1140.https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.46.6.1123